The Special Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no appearance was made by the applicant despite an opportunity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No.
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA1093 0U0st24 t |
None fortheApplicant ShriVinay Tripathi,AdvfortheRespondent |
|
| RespondentCounselinvitingattentionol orderdatedlll03l24praysfordismissalo thisSA. |
||
| Perusaloforderdated11103124itrevealstha onearlieroccasion alsonoone hadappeare( eventhen matterhadbeenadjourned lookinr tointerestofjustice. |
||
| SincetodayalsonooneappearednowthisS1 isbeingdismissedforwantofprosecution. |
||
| Recordbeconsignedtothe record room. (Ram NiwasPatel) PresidingOfficer DRT:.IABALPUR (M.P.&C.G.) |
Applicant
Respondent
Ram Niwas Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
