Rumita Jain v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a non-substantive order containing procedural discrepancies and garbled text without determinate legal reasoning or operative findings.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Vs.q. tqq -oae /zozz
%TT Tq.fr sTBfrrur sffig{
(qwstqT\qfusq)
(ffi{ qffi -qmftq fr rrq fo{rs r}a)
W.g. tq{ -oas /zozz
- sfrdl+{qfr frH fiq B-qtnftq 4sq{, ffi 6re Rts, Udrqqfi d ffi gqnrflqrt er$, gqr, 473001 (q.q.),
- uHET f{qft qtq EqR +{ sqq*q ooq{ ffi +sr, ffi gre ts, Xore.r{q d fid EYr+TaT atqr$, T{r,473001 (q.q.),.............e[ri{fi'rmI
@
1.qqrq fuFrf, tfr T€q ee-€rcr' Yrk2d elffi, ta6 3rTfus -flfu'w rft-zqffiEr tf,n{ ftr& -{-fuw (q.q.),
2.qg e*Trft g-fr * eeS rytrft, ffi fr.fr. trs evrrft Hr{ 6rs{T +ft-trq .F-roilfr, xrT (\q.ft.) +2s001............... wrqqrftlq I
sil-iffi Eht stt{ t fr GT&rq qrcr erBqffir I
Parties & counsel
- respondent
Manjeet Kumar
- petitioner
S.P. Properties
- intervenor
S.P. Properties
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court