lAKSHMI Vilas Bank v. Raju Mohanlal Vasita
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.21
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1063 of 2024 In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.741 of 2023
Lakshmi Vilas Bank
… Applicant
Versus
Raju Mohanlal Vasita … Defendant
Mr Sameer Shaikh i/b M/s. Consulta Juris – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 21st May 2024.
ORDER
- Mr Shaikh, representing the applicant, submits that parties have amicably settled the matter for Rs.60.07 lakhs in full and final satisfaction of the applicant’s claim. It is stated that the court fees is not debited from the borrower’s account and therefore, it is entitled for the refund. Mr Shaikh seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted. Interlocutory Application No.1063 of 2024 is allowed with no order as to costs.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Lakshmi Vilas Bank
- respondent
Raju Mohanlal Vasita
Coram
Deepak M. Thakkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court