Yes Bank v. Anirudh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed the applicant's application for withdrawal of the original recovery petition upon receipt of an affidavit confirming an out-of-court settlement and agreed full and final satisfaction of the dues.
What did the court decide?
A refund of court fees was directed, and the original application was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.23
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1066 of 2024 In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.1114 of 2023
Yes Bank
… Applicant
Versus
Anirudh Pathak … Defendant
Ms Aparna Jagtap i/b Mrs Uma S. Fadia – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 21st May 2024.
ORDER
- Ms Jagtap, representing the applicant, submits that parties have amicably settled the matter for Rs.2,02,70,090.92 in full and final satisfaction of the applicant’s claim. It is stated that the court fees is not debited from the borrower’s account and therefore, it is entitled for the refund. Ms Jagtap seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted. Interlocutory Application No.1066 of 2024 is allowed with no order as to costs.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Yes Bank
Coram
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court