Allowed

Bank of India v. Bhumanna

DRT21 May 2024OA/545/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed an interlocutory application granting permission for the applicant to withdraw its original application following an out-of-court settlement. The original application was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn, and an order directed the refund of court fees.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the Original Application No.545 of 2023; application dismissed as withdrawn; refund of court fees ordered.

Bank of India versus Bhumanna — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2024)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

¶2

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

¶3

Sr. No.8

¶4

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1040 of 2024

¶5

¶6

ORIGINAL APPLICATION

¶7

NO.545 of 2023

¶8

Bank of India … Applicant

¶9

Versus

¶10

Bhumanna Thangella … Defendant

¶11

Ms Dhanshri Wakchaure i/b M/s. O.A. Das and Asso. – Advocates for the applicant.

¶12

None for defendant.

¶13

Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 16^th May 2024.

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Ms Wakchaure submits that the parties have amicably settled the matter for the amount of Rs.28,96,000/- in full and final satisfaction of the applicant’s claim. It is stated that court fee is not debited from the borrower’s account and therefore, is entitled for refund. Ms Wakchaure seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted. Interlocutory Application No.1040 of 2024 is allowed with no order as to costs.

¶16

Sd/-

¶17

(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶18

Nidhi

¶19

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

¶20

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

ORDER SHEET

16.05.2024

Sr. No.8

		OA No.545 of 2023
classifi -cation	No. of Exh.	Bank of India Vs. Bhumanna Thangella
		Ms Dhanshri Wakchaure i/b M/s. O.A. Das and Asso. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant.
		1. Order in I.A. No.1040 of 2024 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1040 of 2024, Original Application No.545 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules.
		Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶25

Nidhi

Bank of India v. Bhumanna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of India v. Bhumanna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalpana Prabhu versus Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited

Jitendra Pratap Singh versus Union Bank of India

Kundalik Kishan Kamble versus Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd.

Yes Bank versus Resham

Yes Bank versus Anirudh

lAKSHMI Vilas Bank versus Raju Mohanlal Vasita