this OA; Notices dated 20.05.2021 and Postal Receipts dated 21.05.2021, which are Annexures A20 to A22 to this OA; Statement of Loan Account along with the Certificate regarding the Computer System and the genuineness of the Statement of Account being prepared through Computer System, which is Annexure A23 to this OA. 5. The loan account became irregular and was classified as NPA and after adjusting debit and credit entries in loan account there was a debit of Rs.46,69,280.25p, which is recoverable and the defendants were served recall notices but they did not repay the outstanding amount, therefore, the applicant bank requested to accept the application and to issue Recovery Certificate accordingly. 6. The defendants were served notices to appear before this Tribunal but no one appeared on behalf of defendants and they were proceeded ex-parte on 19.01.2024. 7. In support of the OA, affidavit of Ms. Annapurna Chakraborty, Branch Manager, Union Bank of India has been filed. 8. Heard ex-parte arguments and perused record. 9. It was argued by learned proxy counsel that in view of the documentary evidence brought on record which had gone unrebutted, the applicant bank had proved its case. From the perusal of all the Annexures A1 to A23 to this OA, it is proved that the defendants approached applicant bank for availing of the loan facility which was granted to them and for that they had executed all the relevant documents in favour of the bank. The defendants failed to pay back the loan as per terms and conditions of the agreement between the parties. Subsequently, account of the defendants was classified as NPA. From the documentary evidence brought on record, it is proved that applicant bank is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.46,69,280.25p (Rupees Forty Six Lacs Sixty Nine Thousand Two Hundred Eighty and Twenty Five Paise only) along with interest from the defendants,
