The DRT dismissed O.A. No. 486 of 2024 and I.A. No. 22 of 2024 as withdrawn settled amicably by the applicant after recovery of the amount.
O.A. No. 486 of 2024 and I.A. No. 22 of 2024 dismissed as withdrawn settled amicably.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kotkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Case No. OAl4a6l2OE
ICICI Bank Ltd. vi samUtru r,r-fiiiojodiya & o
| Orderr/vithsignatu.e | |
|---|---|
| OrderNo. pt.79/o1/2024 Sl.No.41 |
Present: ForApplicant:Mr. A Guhaalongwjth MsIGhosh,LdCounsels ForDefendantINone |
| Ld CounselfortheApplicantfiledLA.No.22of2024inviewof the factthat theO.A.wasfiledseeking recoveryofRs. 4,37t54,857.28/-andprayedforwithdrawalof thepresentO.A. TheapplicationissupportedbyaffidavitofMs.Anuthama Venkatraman, AuthorizedSignatory of the applicant Bank.During thependencyof theO.A.thedefendant have compromisedand settledthematter andtheapplicantbankhasrealjzedand receivedthesettled amount andissuedthe,NoDues Certificate, dated3/O7/2O23andmade prayertodisposeof thematterfor nonprosecution.Thereisnootherimpedimentifprayerisso allowed. Accordingly,I.A.No,22of2024jsdisposedofas withdrawnassettled amicably,. |
|
| The Applicant is directedtoreturntheoriginalTitleDeedtothe O.A.defendantsifitisnotalready returnedwithin15 daysfrom the dateof thisorder.Sofarasrefund ofCourtfeeisconcerned, hemayapproachbeforethe LdRegistrarwhowitake appropriatedecisioninthe matterasperextantrules. O.A. No.486of2022alongwithallpendingI.A.s,ifany,are dismissedaswithdrawnassettled amicably. FilebeconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobservingall formalities. |
|
| (Kamaloej PresidingOfficer DRT-3,Kolkata |
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Kamaloj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
