Uco Bank v. Pradip Bose
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of Procedural Interlocutory Application No. 125 of 2024 as withdrawn, following the settlement of the main Recovery Application.
What did the court decide?
Procedural Application No. 125 of 2024 disposed as withdrawn; main Application No. 553 of 2023 dismissed as withdrawn; Applicant directed to return Original Title Deed.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
| caseNo.OAl5 | UCOBank Vs.PradipBose 53/2023 |
|---|---|
| Dateot Order |
Orderwithsignature |
| OrderNo. Dt.17/0112024 Sl.No,9 |
Present: ForApplicantIMr.l'4Mollaalongwith MsFYasmin,LdCounsels ForDefendant:None |
| Ld Counselfor theApplicantfiledl.A,No.125of2024 inO A.No, 553of2023inviewof thefactthat theO.A, wasfiledseeking recoveryofRs,30,29,27774/-andprayedforwithdrawalofthe present O.A.Theapplicationissupportedbyaffidavitof14r' Kaushal Kumar, AssistantGeneralt'4anageroftheapplicantBank' DuringthependencyoftheO.A,thedefendanthave compromisedandsettledthematterandtheapplicant bankhas realizedandreceivedthe settled amountandissuedthe'NoDues Certificate'andmade prayertodisposeof thematterfornon prosecution. Thereisnootherimpedimentifprayerissoallowed' Accordingly,I.A.No.125of2024 lsdisposedofas withdrawnas settled amicably., The Applicantis directedtoreturntheoriginalTitleDeedtothe o.A.defendantsif itisnotalready returnedwithin15 daysfrom the date ofthisorder,Sofarasrefund ofCourtfeeis concerned, hemayapproachbeforetheLdRegistrarwhowilltake appropriate decisioninthe matterasperextantrules' o.A.No.553of2023alongwithallpending I.As, ifany,are dismissedaswithdrawnassettled amicably' File beconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobserving allformalities' |
|
| (KamalDe ) PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata |
Parties & counsel
- applicant
UCOBank
- respondent
Pradip Bose
Coram
Kamal De
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court