Uco Bank v. Pradip Bose and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed additional application no. 126 of 2024 as withdrawn settled amicably after the matter was compromised and settled between the defendant bank and the applicant.
What did the court decide?
I.A.No.126 of 2024 disposed of as withdrawn as settled amicably.
What the court decided
DebtsRecovery Tribunal-3,Kolkata OrderSheet (Continuation)
[co santvs. PradipBose
| Ord€rwithsignature | |
|---|---|
| OrderNo Dt.rj/01l2024 Sl.No.11 |
Present: ForAoolicant:Mr'M Mollaalongwith MsFYasmin'LdCounsels ForDefendant:None |
| hemayapproachbeforetheLdRegistrarwhowilltake appropriatedecision inthe matterasperextantrules O.A. No.555ot2023alongwithaltpendingI A's'ifany'are dismissedaswithdrawnassettled amicably' File beconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobserving allformalities' (KamalDe) PresidingOfficer DRT-3,Kolkata Ld Counselfor theApplicantfiledI A'No126of2024inO A No' 555of2023inviewofthe factthat theO A t^'asfiledseeking |
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Co sant
- respondent
PradipBose
Coram
KamalDe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court