Interlocutory application allowing withdrawal of an original money recovery application after the defendant regularized the account via payment.
Interlocutory application for withdrawal allowed; Original Application dismissed as withdrawn; court fees to be refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.46
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.228 of 2024
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.442 of 2023
Union Bank of India … Applicant
Versus
Anand M. Chaturvedi … Defendant
Mr Rayyan Khan i/b M/s. Saffron Law Firm – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 2nd February 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer,
DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
02.02.2024
Sr. No.46
| OA No.442 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Union Bank of India Vs. Anand M. Chaturvedi |
| Mr Rayyan Khan i/b M/s. Saffron Law Firm – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 7 | 1. Mr Khan has presented I.A. No.228 of 2024 supported by affidavit (exhibit-7), which is taken on record. |
|
| 2. Order in I.A. No.228 of 2024 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.228 of 2024, Original Application No.442 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Union Bank of India
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
