A single judge allowed an interlocutory application for withdrawal of a recovery application following full settlement. The principal application was dismissed as withdrawn, and court fees ordered for refund.
Permission granted to withdraw original application; court fees to be refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.37
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.168 of 2024
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.1099 of 2023
ICICI Bank Ltd. … Applicant
Versus
Hitesh Kumar Shah … Defendant
Ms Ketki Minhas i/b M/s. H & M Legal Asso. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 1st February 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
01.02.2024
Sr. No.37
| OA No.1099 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Hitesh Kumar Shah |
| Ms Ketki Minhas i/b M/s. H & M Legal Asso. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in I.A. No.168 of 2024 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.168 of 2024, Original Application No.1099 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
