Allowed
Icici Bank Limited v. Panoramic Universal Limited
DRTCA/5/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
01.02.2024
Sr. No.99
| Chamber Appeal No.5 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Panoramic Universal Ltd. |
| Ms Pritee Tapadiya i/b M/s. Bhide & Asso. – Advocates for the appellant. None for respondent. |
||
| 6 | 1. Ms Tapadiya, representing the appellant, has presented additional affidavit (exhibit-6), which is taken on record. The learned counsel requests the Tribunal to allow her to proceed with the case as the objections are removed and CAOD is already filed. Request accepted. Chamber Appeal No.5 of 2023 is allowed with no order as to costs. The learned Registrar is directed to proceed with the registration of the Original Application. |
|
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Panoramic Universal Ltd.
HON'BLE PRESIDING OFFICER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court