The Debt Recovery Tribunal granted the applicant's request to withdraw the original recovery application after receiving the full claim amount. Consequently, the main application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the original application; application stands dismissed as withdrawn with refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.25
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.526 of 2024 In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.311 of 2024
Canara Bank
… Applicant
Versus
Jay Pravin Khanvilkar … Defendant
Ms Merlyne Vasudeo Monteiro – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 11th March 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
11.03.2024
Sr. No.25
| OA No.311 of 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Canara Bank Vs. Jay Pravin Khanvilkar |
| Ms Merlyne Vasudeo Monteiro – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.526 of 2024 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.526 of 2024, Original Application No.311 of 2024 stands dismised as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Canara Bank
Jay Pravin Khanvilkar
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
