Icici Bank Limited v. Mandhana Industries Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order sheet dismissing Original Application No.212 of 2022 for lack of prosecution by the applicant at the hearing on 08.01.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
08.01.2024 Sr. No.31
| OA No.212 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Mandhana Industries Ltd. |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. On 5thJanuary 2024, no representation was made by the applicant therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Original |
||
| Application No.212 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Mandhana Industries Ltd.
PRESIDING OFFICER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court