Dismissed
Om Marg Darshak v. Bank of Baroda
DRTCA/8/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution after applicant failed to file representations. Pending interlocutory applications also disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
¶3
ORDER SHEET
¶4
09.01.2024
¶5
Sr. No.29
¶6
| Chamber Appeal No.8 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Om Marg Darshak Vs. Bank of Baroda |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. On 5thJanuary 2024, no representation was made by the applicant therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Chamber Appeal No.8 of 2023 stand dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. 2. All pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- |
||
| Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai Later on, 3. Mr S.B. Rao, representing the appellant, mentioned the matter, stating that on 29thAugust 2023, the Tribunal disposed of the Chamber Appeal granting an opportunity to the applicant to remove the office objection within two weeks. |
||
| Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
¶7
Radhika
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
AI extract
Whether Chamber Appeal No.8 of 2023 should be held awarded for lack of active prosecution by the appellant.
Whether pending interlocutory applications stand disposed of.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Om Marg Darshak
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
AI extract
Hon'ble Presiding Officer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Deepak M. Thakkar
- Order 2 — this page · Deepak M. Thakkar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court