This order allowed the Chamber Appeal preferred by the appellants to set aside the single judge order declining to register an earlier appeal. The court directed the appellant to remove objections within two weeks and awarded costs.
The Chamber Appeal is allowed with costs made easy; the appellant is directed to remove objections within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
29.08.2023 Sr. No.901
| Chamber Appeal(D) No.1931 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Om Marg Darshak Vs. Bank of Baroda |
| Mr Charles De Souza – Advocate for the appellant. None for respondent. |
||
| 1. The Chamber Appeal is preferred to set aside the order dated 19thApril 2023 declining to register Appeal (D) 851 of 2022. The reasons are set out in paragraphs 27 and 28 are accepted. 2. Chamber Appeal (D) No.1931 of 2023 is allowed with costs made easy. 3. The appellant to remove objections within two weeks. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the chamber appeal to set aside the order declining to register Appeal (D) No.851 of 2022.
Om Marg Darshak
Bank of Baroda
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
