Disposed
Chand Kumar Sehgal v. Bank of India
DRTSA/698/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER.SHE ET
¶2
PAGE No
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA698t22 06/07/23 |
AppticantbyShriAnujAgrawat, Advocate Respondent byShri AshishShroty, Advocate |
|
| Matteristaken upforhearingonlA2927/23dated 03 I 07I23apptication for withdrawat. |
||
| CounselfortheAppticantinviting attention onthe affidavit oftheAppticantShriChandra KumarSehgal submitsthat theRespondentBankhasalready returnedtheamountoftheAppticantswhois saidto bethe auctionpurchaserandthereforedoesnotwish toprosecutethematter further andpraysfor withdrawal of thepresentSA. |
||
| Lookingtothecontentsoftheaffidavitofthe Appticant,theappticationforwithdrawal isattowed. The presentstandsdisposedofaswithdrawn. beconsignedtorecordroom. SID 'r_-. --- - (Ram NiwasPatet) Presidingofficer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
AI extract
Ram Niwas Patel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court