Dismissed
Pushpendra Raikwar v. Aspire Home Finance Corporation Ltd.
DRTSA/375/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
dismissed for want of prosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CON\D. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| 5A375/23 06t07t23 |
NonefortheAppticant RespondentbyParvezAhmedQazi, Advocate,along withTabrez Ahemd Qazi, Advocate Onmatterbeing taken uptheCounselforRespondent whitedrawntheattentionofthisBenchtowardsthe previousorder dated28106123submittedthaton the previousdateatso noneappearedonbehatfofthe Appticantandthereforeapre'emptiveorderwas passedthatincaseofnon-appearanceofthe Appticantonthenext datethemattershattbe dismissed. |
|
| On perusaloforderdated 28106/23it,]eVeats that directionwasgiventotheAppticantsidethatifnone appear onthenext datethe mattershatldismissed. |
||
| Lookingtothepreemptiveorderthe matter Record ts be? dismissedforwantofprosecution. consignedtorecordroom. s/o |
||
| (RamNi#asPatet) Presidingofficer |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court