Application for permission to withdraw a securitisation petition due to an inter se settlement by the parties. Tribunal allowed the withdrawal by consent with no order as to costs.
Securitisation Application No.57 of 2022 allowed with no order as to costs upon withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.20
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1023 of 2023
In
SECURITISATION APPLICATION NO.57 of 2022
Manju Devi Murarka … Applicant
Versus Indian Overseas Bank & Ors. … Defendants
Mr Prafull Mahadik i/b Mr Herbert Noronha – Advocate for the applicant.
Mr Ranveer Chapekar – Advocate for defendant no.1.
Mr Sunil Humbre – Advocate for defendant nos.2 to 5.
ORDER
Sd/- (Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
| 12.0 Sr. N |
5.2023 o.20 |
SA No.57 of 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Manju Devi Murarka Vs Indian Overseas Bank & Ors. |
| Mr Prafull Mahadik i/b Mr Herbert Noronha – Advocate for the applicant. Mr Ranveer Chapekar – Advocate for defendant no.1. Mr Sunil Humbre – Advocate for defendant nos.2 to 5. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.1023 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1023 of 2023, |
||
| Securitisation Application No.57 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Manju Devi Murarka
Indian Overseas Bank
Others
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
