The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellants sought a withdrawal but failed to file any application or representation to that effect on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
12.05.2023 Sr. No.19
| Appeal No.6 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mangal Vijay Nikam & Ors. Vs State Bank of India & Ors. |
| None for the appellants. Mrs A.W. Barve – Advocate for respondents. |
||
| 1. On 18thNovember 2022, 10thFebruary 2023, the appellants sought an adjournment to take steps to |
||
| withdraw the Appeal on the next date. No representation is made by the appellant or filed any application to withdraw the Appeal. Hence, Appeal |
||
| No.6 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Mangal Vijay Nikam & Ors.
State Bank of India & Ors.
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
