In SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.366/2022, the applicant was absent despite notice. The Tribunal deferred filing, directed the respondent to file Vakalatnama, and listed before Registrar for 2023.
Remanded to Registrar for completion of pleading and submitted Vakalatnama.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 13. Sr. |
03.20 No.4 |
23 4 SA No.366/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.366/2022 Asha Balasaheb Ralebhat ..Applicant Versus Canara Bank ..Respondent Mr. D.B. Pokale – Advocate for the applicant. Mr. P.N.Kapadia – Advocate for the respondent bank The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. In this matter the applicant has not served the respondent though the counsel Mr. P.N. Kapadia appears and submit that the applicant has not supplied the paper book 2. The matter is listed for hearing on the point limitation. The applicant was absent on last two dates i.e. on 19th September, 2022 and 21stDecember, 2022 and they are simply prolonging the litigation. There is no interim orders as such the respondent bank is at liberty to proceed ahead. 3. Let the copy be supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent bank. 4. The learned counsel for the respondent bank will file his Vakalatnama. 5. The applicant will be at liberty to approach bank for it settlement. List this matter before Registrar for completion of pleadingon 12thJune, 2023. The parties may download the order from the official web-site. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK] (SA No.366/2022) Page 1 of 1
Asha Balasaheb Ralebhat
Canara Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
