The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the securitisation application in default due to the applicant's non-prosecution after advancing notice without representation.
Securitisation Application No. 366/2022 stood dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 11.07. Sr. No |
2025 .15 SA No. 366/2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATIONS APPLICATION NO. 366/2022. | ||
| Mrs. Asha W/o Balasaheb Ralebhat. ..Applicant Versus Canara Bank. ..Respondent None for the applicants Mr. Kapadia Priyesh Narendra – Advocate for the respondent. 1. In this matter, nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant to conduct the proceeding. Earlier also nobody has appeared. 2. Today also none appeared for the applicant. It appears that, the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order. ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No. 366/2022 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. B. Pending IA’s in the proceeding, if any, are disposed of accordingly. The interim stay, if any also stands vacated. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. | ||
(Dr. J.R. Chauhan) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[ambadas] (SA No.366/2022) Page 1 of 1
Mrs. Asha W/o Balasaheb Ralebhat
Canara Bank
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
