Jasbirkaur Tirlochansingh Bagga v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/433/2022
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
¶2
| 1 S |
0.03.20 r. No.2 |
23 6 SA No.433/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.433/2022 Jasbirkaur Tirlochansingh Bagga ..Applicant Versus State bank of India ..Respondent Mr. S.G. Dodya - Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.V. Adwant – Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through VC. 1. The learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that so far as sale is concerned it failed for want of bids. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant request for time to argue the matter. |
||
| 3. The request of the learned counsel appearing for the applicant is accepted and matter is re-notified. List the matter through VC/hybrid for filing reply and final arguments on01stApril, 2023. The parties may download the order from the official web- site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
¶3
[APK] (SA No.433/2022) Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Jasbirkaur Tirlochansingh Bagga
- respondent
State bank of India
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mr Feroj Ilaisab Bagwan versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited
Ahmednagar Merchant C operative Bank Limited versus Phonix Arc Private Limited
Paldewar Prashant Agro Tech Private Limited versus Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
Deepak Devendra Jagtap versus The Malkapur Urban Co-Op Bank Ltd.