DRT Aurangabad dismissed a securitisation application after the applicant showed no interest to pursue the matter following the respondent bank's submission of a settlement.
The Securitisation Application No.219/2022 stands dismissed and all interim applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 17. Sr. |
05.20 No.3 |
23 2 SA No.219/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.219/2022 Prabhat Agencies ..Applicant Versus Bank of Baroda ..Respondents None for the applicant. Mr. S. R. Vakil – Advocate for the respondent The matter is taken through Video Conference. |
||
| 1. None appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the matter because the learned counsel for the respondent-bank submits that the matter has been settled. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent-bank, I pass the following order through Video Conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.219/2022 stands dismissed. B. All interim applications if any pending stands disposed off. C. Consign the file to the Record Room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.219/2022) Page 1 of 1
Prabhat Agencies
Bank of Baroda
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
