Dismissed
Amit Murlidhar Harale v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/110/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
¶2
| 17. Sr. |
05.20 No.2 |
23 8 SA No.110/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifica tion |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.110/2022 Amit Murlidhar Harale ..Applicant Versus Bank of Baroda ..Respondent None for Applicant Mr. K.D. Pande – Advocate for the respondent-bank. The matter is taken through VC. 1. In this matter the applicant was absent on 25thApril, 2023. None appears for the applicant. |
||
| 2. Today also none appears for the applicants. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. |
||
| ORDER | ||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.110/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. Interim orders if any also stands vacated. C. File be consigned to the record room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
¶3
[SBJ]
¶4
(SA No.110/2022) Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Amit Murlidhar Harale
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court