Dismissed

Punjab National Bank v. Janubai Sah. Thibak Sinchan Yojana Maryadit Ruikhel

DRT15 May 2023OA/368/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad disposed of Original Application No. 368/2022 filed by Punjab National Bank against Janubai Safal Thibak Sinchan Yojana as settled after the applicant's counsel stated that the dues were recovered and the bank sought withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Original Application No. 368/2022 dismissed as settled; original documents to be returned after the time for appeal or review.

Punjab National Bank versus Janubai Sah. Thibak Sinchan Yojana… — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET

¶2

	15.05. Sr. No	2023 .02 OA No. 368/2022
Classific ation	No. of Exh.
		ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 368/2022 Punjab National Bank, Branch Ghogargaon, Tal. Srigonda, Dist. Ahmednagar-413725 ..Applicant Versus Janubai Sah. Thibak Sinchan Yojana Maryadit Ruikhel & others ..Defendant Mr. Pankaj Mahajan h/for Mr. S. J. Pande – Advocate for the applicant-bank. None for the defendant. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant-bank submits that the matter is settled. In these circumstances he seeks permission of this Tribunal for withdrawal of the Original Application. 2. The matter is stated to be settled. However, the application for withdrawal of the Original Application is still not moved.
		3. There is no need to keep the matter pending. Since the matter has already been settled the Original Application shall disposed off as settled. 4. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant bank, I pass the following order through Video Conference: ORDER A. Original Application No.368/2022 stands dismissed as the

¶3

[SBJ] (OA No.368/2022) Page 1 of 2

¶4

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

¶5

ORDER SHEET

¶6

bank has recovered the dues and nothing remains to be paid.

¶7

B. As per DRT Regulation 25, other original documents if any filed be returned by keeping certified copies on record through Authorised Officer only after the time of appeal or review is gone and not before that.

¶8

C. Consign the file to the Record Room.

¶9

(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶10

[SBJ] (OA No.368/2022) Page 2 of 2

Punjab National Bank v. Janubai Sah. Thibak Sinchan Yojana Maryadit Ruikhel

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Punjab National Bank v. Janubai Sah. Thibak Sinchan Yojana Maryadit Ruikhel

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Chandrakant Jadhav versus Union Bank of India

Vishal Balasaheb Avare versus Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited

Hdfc Bank Limited versus Dilip Uttamrao Suryawanshi

Uttamrao Raosaheb Bornare versus Ajantha Urban Co-Op Bank Ltd.

Prashant Bhaurao Vaidya versus Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited

Santosh Vasantrao Kulkarni versus the Chikhli Urban Co-Op Bank Ltd.