Securitisation application dismissed for non-prosecution. Applicant absent on multiple hearings; court treated matter as not pursued and disposed of pending interlocutory applications.
Securitisation Application No.138/2022 stood dismissed for non-prosecution. All pending Interlocutory Applications stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 20.05. Sr. No |
2023 .17 SA No. 138 /2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION NO. 138/2022 | ||
| Shoyeb Ahemad Haji Mahemood Khan ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India ..Respondent None for the applicant. None for the respondent - bank. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. In this matter the applicant was not appearing. The applicant was also absent on 22ndAugust, 2022, 15th November, 2022 and on 21stApril, 2023. 2. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter and as such it is liable to be dismissed. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through Video Conference: ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.138/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution of the matter. |
||
| B. Accordingly all the pending Interlocutory Applications stands disposed off. C. Consign the file to the Record Room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.138/2022) Page 1 of 1
Shoyeb Ahemad Haji Mahemood Khan
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
