The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad, dismissed a securitisation application for non-prosecution as the applicant was absent and showed no interest in pursuing the matter.
Securitisation Application No.127/2022 dismissed for non-prosecution; pending IAs disposed of accordingly; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 0 S |
5.07.2 r. No. |
023 21 SA No.127/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.127/2022 | ||
| Dharamraj Hukumchand Jafre ..Applicant Versus Bank of Baroda ..Respondent None for the applicant. The matter is taken through Video Conference. |
||
| 1. In this matter the applicant was absent on 30th September, 2022, 31stJanuary, 2023 and 06thSeptember, 2023. None appears for the applicant. |
||
| 2. Today also none appears for the applicants. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. |
||
| 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.127/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. Interim orders if any also stands vacated. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.127/2022) Page 1 of 1
Dharamraj Hukumchand Jafre
Bank of Baroda
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
