The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a securitisation application for non-prosecution due to the applicant's absence.
Securitisation Application No. 84/2023 stood dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 0 S |
6.07.2 r. No. |
023 33 SA No. 84/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No. 84/2023 | ||
| Sainath Electronics ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India. ..Respondents None for the applicant. None for the respondent. The matter is taken through VC. 1. On the last date of hearing i.e. on 25thMay, 2023 nobody appeared for the applicant. 2. Today also none appears for the applicants. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing: ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.84/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the Record Room |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.84/2023) Page 1 of 1
Sainath Electronics
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
