The Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed the borrower's applications as the applicant settled the dispute, withdrew the original recovery application, and was granted a refund of court fees with the original dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the Original Application granted; Interlocutory Applications allowed; Court fees refunded; Documents returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.13
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1568 of 2023 And INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1620 of 2023
In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.505 of 2022
ICICI Bank Ltd. … Applicant
Versus
Mr Chandresh Rao i/b M/s. Vidhii Partners – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer,st August 2023.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
01.08.2023 Sr. No.13
| OA No.505 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. M/s. Nomad Films Ltd. & Ors. |
| Mr Chandresh Rao i/b M/s. Vidhii Partners – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.1568 of 2023 and Interlocutory Application No.1620 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1568 of 2023 and I.A. No.1620 of 2023, Original Application No.505 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed (i) to refund the court fees and (ii) to return the original documents as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
ICICI Bank Ltd.
M/s. Nomad Films Ltd. & Ors.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
