The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed Securitization Application No. 25 of 2022 for want of prosecution, as the applicants ceased attending hearings from March 3, 2023, without representation before the tribunal on the date of listing.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
14.07.2023 Sr. No.14
| SA No.25 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr Suryanarayan Gopinath Shukla & Ors. Vs. ICICI Bank Ltd. |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar shows that the applicants have stopped attending the case since 3rdMarch 2023 and therefore the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicants either personally or through the advocate. It appears the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Securitization Application No.25 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Mr. Suryanarayan Gopinath Shukla & Ors.
ICICI Bank Ltd.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
