City Union Bank Limited v. Kesari Synthetics Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Order No. 938 of 2023, arising from O.A. No. 938 of 2023, was allowed to be withdrawn per the DRT-II ruling of 26.09.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 26.09.2023 | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No. 938 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|
| Advocate Ms. Chitra Shekhawat proxy counsel for Advocate Mr. R.L. Motwani for the Applicant Bank. Defendants absent. Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application (I.A. No.2067 of 2023) for withdrawal of the O.A. No.938 of 2023. Pursuant to settlement arrived at with Defendants and having received Rs.4,25,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of the Claim under O.A., Applicant Bank moved an Interlocutory Application (I.A.) No.2067 of 2023 seeking withdrawal of the O.A. which is allowed and O.A. No.938 of 2023 stands disposed of as withdrawn. This Tribunal orders refund of court fee as per the Rules. File be consigned to the Record Room. |
||
| Sd/- I/c P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant Bank
Defendants
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court