The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed off the applicant's Original Application due to absence of applicant's counsel and bank officer, with liberty to revive the matter later.
OA disposed off with liberty to applicant to revive the same as and when required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 15/12/2022 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in OA 427 of 2022 Bank of Maharashtra Vs Mr Kanayo R Thakur |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate Vivek Vasant Phadke appeared for the applicant. Advocate Aparna D. Jagtap a/w Divya D. Jain i/b Uma S Fadia, defendant no. 4C & 4E appeared for the defendant nos. 1 & 2. This matter was adjourned on request of the applicant on multiple time and on the last occasion officer of the bank was directed to remain present however he is not present despite direction. Record reveals that from last two days adjourned was sought by Ld. Counsel for the applicant for taking instructions however today neither counsel for applicant nor the officer of the bank present in the Tribunal. |
|||
| Ld. Counsel for the defendants already informed that the other OA which are filed against the same defendant has already been disposed off with liberty. |
In view of the facts that NCLT proceeding has
been initiated for all the contesting defendants
therefore the present OA is hereby disposed
off with liberty to the applicant to revive the
same as and when required.
File be closed and confined to record room.
Sd/-
P.O.
DRT-I
Sgj/-27
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bank of Maharashtra
Mr Kanayo R Thakur
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
