Dismissed
Yes Bank v. Surana Developers Wadala LLP
DRTOA/323/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Allowed withdrawal of the application and dismissed the order as withdrawn.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 14/12/2022 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in OA 323 of 2022 YES Bank Vs Surana Developers Wadala LLP |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate Mr. Vinod Kothari appeared for the Applicant. IA No. 1431/2022 1. By way of the present IA, the Applicant is seeking withdrawal of the present OA. 2. Ld. Counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant do not wish to pursue the OA and the Applicant will explore other available alternate remedy to recover their outstanding dues. 3. In view of the above the present IA is hereby allowed and the present OA is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. File be closed and consigned to record room. P.O. DRT-I |
¶2
Sgj/-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
YES Bank
- respondent
Surana Developers Wadala LLP
Coram
AI extract
Rekha G. Dhakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court