The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of the original application as withdrawn after the applicant's advocate sought and obtained permission to withdraw. The Tribunal passed an order allowing an interlocutory application and directed a refund of court fees.
Permission granted to withdraw the original application; OA disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.8
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.379 of 2022
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.379 of 2022
Central Bank of India
… Applicant
Versus Gurjar Kutir Udyog & Anr … Defendants
Mr Puneet Gogad i/b Mr Meghnath Navlani – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 7th September, 2022.
ORDER
Page 1 of 3
delayed period in the sum of Rs.9,47,227/- aggregate sum of Rs.2,31,84,670/- is received by the applicant. Mr Gogad drew the Tribunal’s attention to the photocopies of the documents annexed to the application. Mr Gogad seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted.
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai
Radhika
Page 2 of 3
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
07.09.2022
Sr. No.8
| OA No.379 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classify- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Central Bank of India Vs. Gurjar Kutir Udyog & Anr. |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. No representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. 2. For dismissal, stand-over to 14thNovember, 2022. |
||
| Presiding Officer, D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai Later on, 1. Mr Gogad, mentioned the matter and requests the Tribunal to take up I.A. No.1899 of 2022. Accordingly, the Tribunal took up the I.A. No.1899 of 2022. 2. Order in I.A. No.1899 of 2022 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1899 of 2022, O.A. No.379 of 2022 stands disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. Refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- | ||
| Presiding Officer, D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Page 3 of 3
Central Bank of India
Gurjar Kutir Udyog & Anr.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
