The Tribunal allowed the interlocutory application seeking permission to withdraw the original money recovery application filed by the applicant, noting the delayed filing and insufficient explanation for delay.
Permission granted to withdraw the Original Application and refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.19
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.929 of 2022 In ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.278 of 2022
Bank of Baroda
… Applicant
Versus
Mr Shadab Ali & Ors.
… Defendants
Mr A.S. Ramesan – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkarth August, 2022.
ORDER
the applicant to withdraw the Original Application as stated in the application and the affidavit.
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
11.08.2022
Sr. No.19
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
OA No.278 of 2022 Bank of Baroda Vs. Mr. Shadab Ali & Ors. |
|---|---|---|
| Mr A.S. Ramesan – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 9 | 1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented affidavit (exhibit-9), which is taken on record. 2. Order in I.A. No.929 of 2022 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.929 of 2022, O.A. No278 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. Refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
|
| Radhika | Sd/- Presiding Officer, D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application seeking permission to withdraw an original application after delay and negligence should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bank of Baroda
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
