The Tribunal allowed an application to withdraw a recovery certificate as the referenced oral agreement was dismissed, accepting that the matter was compromised and the compromise amount was received.
MA allowed; RC No. 329 of 2017 dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court
Office action taken with data
Date of order or proceeding
MA 143 of 2022
| State Bank of India Vs R.K. Engineering Corporation and others Present: Shri S.K. Singh Ld. counsel for the applicant None for the respondent |
|
|---|---|
| 15.09.2022 | This Miscellaneous Application has been filed by applicant seeking permission to withdraw the RC no. 329 of2017 in OA nO.5830f2016. It is stated therein that the matter has been compromised and the compromise amount has been received by the applicant bank. This application is supported by an affidavit of Shri Shashi Ranjan Choudhary S/o Shri Krishna Dev Chooudhary, Chief Manager, SBI, SARB Patna which substantiates the contents of the application. It is also supported by a copy of letter dated 29.12.2021 address to Shri S.K. Singh ld. counsel for the applicant bank with instructions to withdraw the OA in question. Under the circumstances, the MA stands allowed and RC no.329 of 2017 is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Original documents, if any lying with the Tribunal be returned to the applicant bank as per rule. Consigned the record. A Copy of order be sent to the parties and Ld. Recovery Officer for necessary action. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. /~ { .: (7 (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer Patna |
State Bank of India
R.K. Engineering Corporation
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
