In MA 131 of 2022, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna, allowed an applicant's application to set aside a default dismissal order as the case was technically missed despite written notice, restoring earlier proceedings.
Order dated 6.4.2022 in MA 42/2018 set aside; MA 42/2018 restored and listed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Office action taken with data
| Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
|---|---|
| MA 131 of 2022 Anil Kumar Vs State Bank of India Present Shri N.K. Singh Ld. counsel for the applicant None for the respondent |
|
| 14.09.2022 | Ld. counsel for applicant submits that the case was not listed in the cause list which has been displayed on the website, therefore, he could not attend the case, therefore, the case was dismissed for default. It has been informed that due to technical reasons, it could not be displayed however; a notice was given in writing in cause list which was displayed on the notice board of this Tribunal. In the interest in justice the application is allowed and the order dated 6.4.2022 passed in MA no. 42/2018 is hereby set aside and MA 42/2018 IS restored. Accordingly, this MA stands disposed of. List the MA_no.42/20_ 18 for hearing on 1.11.2022. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer |
Anil Kumar
State Bank of India
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
