Sachin Jain v. Jm Financial Asset Reconstrution Company
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal declined to register an appeal listed for defect removal as the appellant's counsel was absent and defects remained unresolved, resulting in abandonment of the case.
What did the court decide?
Appeal declined to be registered.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - ALLAHABAD
Diary No. 1713/2026
(Arising out of SA 269 of 2019 JABALPUR DRT)
Date:15.07.2026
Sachin Jain ....Appellant
--Vs—
JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company …... Respondents
The present appeal was listed today for removal of defects as last opportunity, yet none appeared. Despite granting several opportunities in the past for removal of defects, defects have not been reconciled yet, it appears that the appellant counsel is not interested in pursuing this case, therefore the case is declined to register.
AM Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sachin Jain
- respondent
JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090017132026
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court