Mohd Raseed v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal refused to register the instant appeal due to unrectified defects and the apparent lack of interest by the appellant's counsel.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - ALLAHABAD
Diary No. 1042/2026
Date:17.07.2026
Mohd Raseed ....Appellant
--Vs—
UCO Bank …... Respondents
None present for the Applicant.
Ld.Counsel for the respondent bank Shri Abhay Singh Tomar is present.
The present case was listed today for removal of defects as last opportunity. Despite granting several opportunities in the past for removal of defects, defects have not been reconciled yet, it appears that the applicant counsel is not interested in pursuing this case, therefore the case is declined to register.
Registrar
AM
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohd Raseed
- respondent
UCO Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090010422026
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court