Application under Section 17(A) of the DRT Act was disposed of as unnecessary since the charge was transferred to DRT-2 Ahmedabad.
Application not required to be registered; matter not registered with Registrar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - ALLAHABAD
Diary No. 1643/2026
(Arising out of SA 18 of 2025 RANCHI DRT)
Date:10.07.2026
Pintu Engineering Construction Pvt Ltd ....Appellant
--Vs—
State Bank Of India ... Respondents
Ld.Counsel for the applicant Shri V K Shukla is present.
Ld. Counsel submits that since the charge of DRT Ranchi has been given to DRT-2 Ahmedabad therefore he does not wish to press the present application u/s 17(A).
In view of the above submission, the application is not required to be registered
Registrar
AM
Pintu Engineering Construction Pvt Ltd
State Bank Of India
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
