Ms Annapurna Wood Supplier v. Ugro Capital Limited
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Appeal Diary No. 841 of 2024 (Arising out of S.A. 265 of 2024 in DRT-II, Kolkata)
Order No. 27 28.07.2026 M/s. Annapurna Wood Supplier & 2 Others … Appellants -VsUgro Capital Limited … Respondent
None for Appellant
Mr. Rajeev Maity (Virtual), Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1, Mr. Rajeev Maity, on instruction, submits that the account has been settled between the parties although the Appellant is not present even in the revised list.
In view of the submission made by the Learned Counsel for Respondent, appeal is dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Copy of the Judgment/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s Website.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Annapurna Wood Supplier & 2 Others
- respondent
Ugro Capital Limited
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 191090008412024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court