Jainco Projects (India) Ltd. v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant withdrew the appeal, though pre-deposit order was not complied with. The doubt was dispelled in favor of settling the person as the honor. The bench dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Appeal Diary No. 494 of 2025
(Arising out of S.A. 109 of 2019 in DRT-I, Kolkata)
Order No. 15
27.07.2026 M/s. Jainco Projects (India) Limited & 2 Others … Appellants -VsUCO Bank …Respondent
Mr. Tanupriyo Roy with Ms. Tanisha Khandelwal, Learned Counsel for Appellants
Mr. Santosh Kumar Ray with Ms. Ashmita Lohia and Ms. Varsha Khowala, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Learned Counsel for Appellant endorses on the Memo of Appeal that they are not pressing the appeal and withdrawing the same.
Order of pre deposit dated 11.7.2025 is also not complied with. C.O. 3021 of 2025 which is filed against that order before the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court is also dismissed. However, since the Appellants are not pressing the appeal, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Jainco Projects (India) Limited & 2 Others
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 191090004942025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court