Mr Amit Kumar Chelluri v. Iifl Home Finance Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal in default because the appellant failed to appear and did not file an application seeking waiver from the pre-deposit requirement.
What did the court decide?
The appeal and the application for waiver of pre-deposit are dismissed in default.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Appeal Dy. No. 1141 of 2025 (Arising out of S.A. No. 81 of 2020 in DRT-2, Hyderabad)
Order No.10 19.05.2026
Amit Kumar Chelluri ……Appellant
-Vs-
IIFL Home Finance Limited & Ors. … Respondents
None for Appellant
Ms. Tutul Das Singh with Mr. Bhaskar Chakraborty, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list. None is present for the Appellants. Accordingly, I.A. No. 667 of 2025 Application for waiver from making pre-deposit is dismissed in default. Consequently, Appeal being Appeal Dy. No. 1141 of 2025 is also dismissed in default.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Amit Kumar Chelluri
- respondent
IIFL Home Finance Limited
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 191090011412025
- Topic
- Arbitration
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court