Matang Petroleum Co. and Ors. v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
In Regular Appeal D. No. 839/2025, the Appellant was absent and failed to comply with objections. The Registrar presumed disinterest and declined registration under DRAT Rules, 1994.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mumbai
Regular Appeal D.No. 83912025
Matang Petroleum Co.& Ors
Appellant
-Vs-
Bank Of Baroda
Respondents
Regular Appeat D. No.839/2025 is listed on today's board(13.05.2026) before the Ld. Registrarat 11.30 AM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayedin Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board ofDRAT Mumbai.
None appeared for theAppellantwhen matter is called out.
This Regular Appeat D.No. 839t2025 was filed on 03-06-2025and certain objections were raisedby the Registryfor compliance/removalof defects. However, despite sufficientopportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it ispresumed that,the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to register a regular appeal for compliance/removal of defects after the appellant failed to appear or comply.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Matang Petroleum Co.
- respondent
Bank Of Baroda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court