The Registrar of DRAT Mumbai declined registration of Misc. Application D. No. 176212024 under Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994, as the appellant failed to comply with objections despite sufficient opportunity.
Misc. Application D. No. 176212024 is declined for registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Misc. Application D.No. 176212024
M/s Ashwin Craneand Construction
... ....Appellant
-Vs-
Asset ReconstructionCompany (lndia) Ltd. & Ors.
Respondents
Misc. ApplicationD. No. 1762t2024 is listed on today's board (13.05.2026) before the Ld. Registrarat 11.30 AM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayedin Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the NoticeBoardof DRAT Mumbai.
None appearedfor the Appellantwhen matter is called out.
This Misc. ApplicationD. No. 176212024was filed on 14.08.2024and certain objectionswere raisedby the Registry for compliance/removal of defects. However,despite sufficient opportunity,appellant failed to comply with/remove thedefects till date.
Therefore, it ispresumed that,the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
ln view of the above& under the provisions of Sub Rule ( ) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 theMisc.Application D. No. 176212024is hereby declined forRegistration.
Date: 13.05.2026
Registrar DRAT Mumbai
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Ashwin Crane & Construction
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. & Ors.
Registrar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
