The Registrar of DRAT Mumbai declined to register a Misc. Appeal (D. No. 15661/2024) because the appellant failed to comply with registry objections to remove defects. The matter was deemed infructuous following the dismissal of the underlying application by the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
Misc. Appeal D. No. 15661/2024 is declined for registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Misc. AppealD. No. 156612024
Ketan JayantilalShah
... ....Appellant
-Vs-
lndian Bank(Allahabad Bank) & Ors.
Respondents
Misc. AppealD. No. 1566t2024is listed on today's board (13.05.2026) before the Ld. Registrarat 1L30 AM for compliance/removalof defects.The said Board is displayedin Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Boardof DRAT Mumbai'
Adv. Anushreeappeared for the Appellantwhen matter is called out'
This Misc. AppealD. No. 1566t2024 was filed on20.07.2024and certain objections wereraised by the Registryfor compliance/removalof defects' However, despitesufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects tilldate. Advocate for Appellant filed pursis today stating that the sA no. 122 of2)24was dismissedby the Hon',ble DRT ll Mumbai and as such the present appealbecame infructuous.
Therefore, itis presumed that,the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
ln view of the above& under the provisions of sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules,1994the Misc. Appeal D. No' 156612024 is hereby declined for Registration.
Date: 13.05.2026
Registrar DRAT Mumbai
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ketan Jayantilal Shah
Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank) & Others
Registrar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
