Vimla Singh v. State Bank of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The miscellaneous application was dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite being listed for hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Misc. Application No. 47/2025 In M.A. No. 56/2022 In Appeal Dy. No. 227/2019 Date: 21.04.2025
Vimla Singh Vs. State Bank of India & 2 Ors.
Present: None for the applicant, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Ashish Pratap Singh, counsel for the respondent,
No one appears on behalf of the applicant even in the revised reading of cause list, therefore, the misc. application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vimla Singh
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 091090002272019
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court