The Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal filed by Smt. Rutupurna Dhirsamant against an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Cuttack, for failure of the appellant to appear. The proceedings were disposed of in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Appeal No. 69 of 2023 (Arising out of S.A. 16 of 2016 in DRT, Cuttack)
Order No. 29 16.5.2025 Smt. Rutupurna Dhirsamant … Appellant -VsUCO Bank & 3 Others … Respondents
None for Appellant
Ms. Rituparna Sanyal (Virtual), Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the revised list. None appears for the Appellants. Learned Counsel for Respondent is present virtually.
Accordingly the appeal stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents
and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 16th May, 2025 25/ac
Smt. Rutupurna Dhirsamant
UCO Bank & 3 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
