The Tribunal, in absence of the appellant, dismissed applications for condonation of delay and waiver of pre-deposit. Consequently, the appeal raised against a DRT order was dismissed as time barred and not maintainable.
Applications for condonation of delay and pre-deposit waiver dismissed; Appeal dismissed as time barred and not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal Dy No. 106 of 2019 (Arising out of SA 16 of 2016 – DRT – Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
27.02.2023
Smt. Rutuparna Dhirsamant
… Appellant -Vs-
UCO Bank
… Respondents None for the appellant. Smt. R. Sanyal, ld. Counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list.
None is present for the appellant. Application for condonation of delay filed u/s 5 of the Limitation Act as well as application for waiver from making pre-deposit filed u/s 18(1) of the Act of 2022 are dismissed for default.
Accordingly, appeal is also dismissed as time barred and not maintainable.
No order as to costs.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 27 February, 2023 04/pkb
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal was maintainable and time barred without condonation of delay or waiver of pre-deposit.
Whether order dismissing the applications for condonation of delay and pre-deposit was correct.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Rutuparna Dhirsamant
UCO Bank
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
